Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Snark AI Inc. has 1 pending office action within its patent portfolio. This activity is categorized under the Computing & Software technology area. The 1 pending action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TUAN A PHAM, who is the busiest examiner for this portfolio with 1 pending office action.
The portfolio's current prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the pending matter is being reviewed within a specific technical group at the USPTO. TUAN A PHAM is the sole examiner responsible for the 1 pending office action currently active for the company.
With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the portfolio's current workload is highly focused. The use of 1 distinct art unit within the Computing & Software area suggests a specific technical application. TUAN A PHAM's role as the busiest examiner involves managing the only pending action in the dataset, ensuring a unified prosecution strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, TUAN A | 1 | 83.6% | +27.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19005552 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINED EMBEDDING MAPPINGS FOR IMPROVED RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED GENERATION | PHAM, TUAN A | 11d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19005552 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINED EMBEDDING MAPPINGS FOR IMPROVED RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED GENERATION | PHAM, TUAN A | 11d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2163 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19005552 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINED EMBEDDING MAPPINGS FOR IMPROVED RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED GENERATION | PHAM, TUAN A | 2163 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial