Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Socialgood Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Socialgood Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. STEVEN R CHISM is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for the 1 pending office action. This single pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current active prosecution. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution process is straightforward and centralized.

Success in this matter depends on addressing the specific concerns raised by STEVEN R CHISM regarding the 1 pending office action. The presence of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the technical evaluation remains within a specific administrative framework. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the busiest examiner to resolve the pending case in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The focused nature of this prosecution allows for a deep dive into the specific preferences of the 1 official involved. Every detail in the 1 distinct art unit is critical to the company's success.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHISM, STEVEN R 1 30.8% +42.3%
JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 1 20.0% +88.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18871951 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium, and Information Processing Apparatus JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 12d
18876445 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium and Information Processing Apparatus CHISM, STEVEN R —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18871951 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium, and Information Processing Apparatus JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 12d
18876445 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium and Information Processing Apparatus CHISM, STEVEN R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3689 1
3697 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18876445 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium and Information Processing Apparatus CHISM, STEVEN R 3689 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18871951 Information Processing Method, Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium, and Information Processing Apparatus JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 3697 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Dec 05, 2024

Managing Socialgood Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month