Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Software AG operates within the Computing & Software technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within a distinct art unit. The portfolio's focus on Computing & Software involves a single point of contact at the patent office for its current pending matter.
ADAMS, CHARLES D is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for the busiest examiner pending office action. This figure accounts for the total pending office actions for the company. The examiner ADAMS, CHARLES D is the only individual currently reviewing pending office actions for the company.
The alignment of prosecution across the distinct examiner and the distinct art unit shows the distribution of the workload. ADAMS, CHARLES D is the sole examiner handling the busiest examiner pending office action. This arrangement in the Computing & Software area means the company's current patent office interactions are limited to this single examiner and art unit. Practitioners should note that all current prosecution activity is consolidated under these specific parameters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMS, CHARLES D | 1 | 44.9% | +43.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18392139 | SYSTEMS AND/OR METHODS FOR CONDITIONAL DATA PARTITIONING | ADAMS, CHARLES D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18392139 | SYSTEMS AND/OR METHODS FOR CONDITIONAL DATA PARTITIONING | ADAMS, CHARLES D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2152 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18392139 | SYSTEMS AND/OR METHODS FOR CONDITIONAL DATA PARTITIONING | ADAMS, CHARLES D | 2152 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial