Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Soluna Holdings Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution is split between 2 distinct art units. This indicates that each of the company's pending actions is being reviewed in a different technical environment, requiring a tailored approach for each application.
CLARE, MARK C is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action. With 2 pending actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is managing one application. The involvement of 2 distinct art units for 2 pending actions suggests a range of technical subject matter within this portfolio. This distribution requires the applicant to navigate the specific requirements of 2 different technical departments and the individual preferences of 2 distinct examiners. Success in this portfolio depends on the ability to address the unique technical standards of each of the 2 distinct art units while managing these separate examiner interactions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLARE, MARK C | 1 | 14.2% | +19.9% |
| KABIR, SAAD M | 1 | 68.5% | +24.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19098442 | LOGICAL DATA CENTER | CLARE, MARK C | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19098442 | LOGICAL DATA CENTER | CLARE, MARK C | 13d |
| 18116275 | LOCAL CO-OPTIMIZATION OF POWER GENERATION SUPPLY WITH DATA CENTER ENERGY DEMAND | KABIR, SAAD M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| 2119 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19098442 | LOGICAL DATA CENTER | CLARE, MARK C | 3628 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Apr 02, 2025 |
| 18116275 | LOCAL CO-OPTIMIZATION OF POWER GENERATION SUPPLY WITH DATA CENTER ENERGY DEMAND | KABIR, SAAD M | 2119 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial