Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Spectainer Pty Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates the technological scope of the company's current patent applications. Practitioners should note that the pending workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which defines the coordination of prosecution strategies across the portfolio.
ALLEN, JEFFREY R is identified as the busiest examiner for Spectainer Pty Ltd., currently overseeing 1 pending office action. As ALLEN, JEFFREY R is responsible for 1 pending office action, this individual represents a point of contact for the company's interactions with the patent office. The distribution of the workload among the 1 distinct examiner indicates how the company's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering filings are being processed. Practitioners should monitor the 1 distinct art unit for updates on the pending prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, JEFFREY R | 1 | 48.1% | +26.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18860577 | COLLAPSIBLE INTERMODAL CONTAINER | ALLEN, JEFFREY R | 38d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18860577 | COLLAPSIBLE INTERMODAL CONTAINER | ALLEN, JEFFREY R | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3733 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18860577 | COLLAPSIBLE INTERMODAL CONTAINER | ALLEN, JEFFREY R | 3733 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Oct 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial