Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sports Data Labs Inc.

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sports Data Labs Inc. is currently navigating 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 4 actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is being handled by a different individual. These examiners are located across 3 distinct art units, indicating some concentration of the company's filings within specific examination departments.

NGUYEN, TAI T is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 4 pending office actions, the workload is split such that each of the 4 distinct examiners is responsible for one action. This distribution ensures that no single examiner has a majority of the company's pending cases, though they are spread across 3 distinct art units.

The fact that the pending office actions involve 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units suggests a diverse but somewhat overlapping prosecution environment. Practitioners must manage the individual preferences of the examiners while also considering the departmental standards of the 3 distinct art units. This structure requires a broad strategy to address the varied feedback across the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (50%)
§103 only2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, TAI T 1 84.7% +17.3%
POINT, RUFUS C 1 74.2% +18.0%
MACCAGNO, PIERRE L 1 23.8% +30.0%
WALTON, CHESIREE A 1 31.0% +29.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18288554 ANIMAL DATA-BASED IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND METHOD NGUYEN, TAI T —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17054277 BIOLOGICAL DATA TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD MACCAGNO, PIERRE L —
16977278 ANIMAL DATA PREDICTION SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18231345 ANIMAL DATA COMPLIANCE SYSTEM AND METHOD POINT, RUFUS C 4d overdue
18288554 ANIMAL DATA-BASED IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND METHOD NGUYEN, TAI T —
17054277 BIOLOGICAL DATA TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD MACCAGNO, PIERRE L —
16977278 ANIMAL DATA PREDICTION SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3687 2
2689 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18288554 ANIMAL DATA-BASED IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND METHOD NGUYEN, TAI T 3687 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 26, 2023
18231345 ANIMAL DATA COMPLIANCE SYSTEM AND METHOD POINT, RUFUS C 2689 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Aug 08, 2023
17054277 BIOLOGICAL DATA TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD MACCAGNO, PIERRE L 3687 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 10, 2020
16977278 ANIMAL DATA PREDICTION SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2020

Managing Sports Data Labs Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month