Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| §102 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIM, SENG HENG | 1 | 66.2% | +28.9% |
| GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 21.5% | +6.8% |
| MCCULLOCH JR, WILLIAM H | 1 | 53.7% | +33.5% |
| WORKU, SARON MATTHEWOS | 1 | 65.0% | +60.0% |
| HYLINSKI, STEVEN J | 1 | 75.4% | +17.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18740357 | GAME SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM INCLUDING VIDEO GAME PROCESSING PROGRAM | GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 62d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18503095 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, COMPUTER APPARATUS AND METHOD | HYLINSKI, STEVEN J | 49d overdue |
| 18620726 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND VIDEO GAME PROCESSING SYSTEM | MCCULLOCH JR, WILLIAM H | 44d overdue |
| 18761139 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND METHOD | LIM, SENG HENG | 9d |
| 18438206 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD | WORKU, SARON MATTHEWOS | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 4 |
| 2408 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18761139 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND METHOD | LIM, SENG HENG | 3715 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Jul 01, 2024 |
| 18740357 | GAME SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM INCLUDING VIDEO GAME PROCESSING PROGRAM | GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 3715 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 62d | Pending | Jun 11, 2024 |
| 18620726 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND VIDEO GAME PROCESSING SYSTEM | MCCULLOCH JR, WILLIAM H | 3715 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 44d overdue | Pending | Mar 28, 2024 |
| 18438206 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD | WORKU, SARON MATTHEWOS | 2408 | §103 | Final Rejection | 26d | Pending | Feb 09, 2024 |
| 18503095 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, COMPUTER APPARATUS AND METHOD | HYLINSKI, STEVEN J | 3715 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 49d overdue | Pending | Nov 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial