Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Starfire Industries LLC

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Starfire Industries LLC currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter is distributed to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a focused prosecution landscape for the company's current filings. The presence of 1 pending office action indicates a limited but specific engagement with the patent office at this time. By operating within 1 distinct art unit, the company can ensure that its technical arguments are reviewed by a consistent group of experts in the chemistry field. This concentration allows for a highly specialized prosecution strategy that addresses the specific requirements of the assigned unit.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is BAND, MICHAEL A, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This individual workload accounts for the entirety of the company's pending actions, as the busiest examiner pending count is 1. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific examiner's patterns to advance the prosecution of this Chemistry & Materials case. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying examiner behaviors. Instead, the focus should be on providing the specific evidence and arguments that this one examiner requires to resolve the pending office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1 63.7% +24.3%
BAND, MICHAEL A 1 45.1% +55.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19033192 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR METAL AND CERAMIC NANOLAYERING FOR ACCIDENT TOLERANT NUCLEAR FUEL, PARTICLE ACCELERATORS, AND AEROSPACE LEADING EDGES MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 26d overdue

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19033192 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR METAL AND CERAMIC NANOLAYERING FOR ACCIDENT TOLERANT NUCLEAR FUEL, PARTICLE ACCELERATORS, AND AEROSPACE LEADING EDGES MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 26d overdue
17580585 BELLOWS COATING BY MAGNETRON SPUTTERING WITH KICK PULSE BAND, MICHAEL A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1794 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19033192 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR METAL AND CERAMIC NANOLAYERING FOR ACCIDENT TOLERANT NUCLEAR FUEL, PARTICLE ACCELERATORS, AND AEROSPACE LEADING EDGES MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1794 §103§112Other Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Jan 21, 2025
17580585 BELLOWS COATING BY MAGNETRON SPUTTERING WITH KICK PULSE BAND, MICHAEL A 1794 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 20, 2022

Managing Starfire Industries LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Starfire Industries LLC have?

Starfire Industries LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Starfire Industries LLC applications?

Rodney Glenn Mcdonald has the most, with 1 of Starfire Industries LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Starfire Industries LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month