Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Steampower Innovativa S R L currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly centralized prosecution status where all current activity is focused on a single application or a very closely related group of claims within the patent office.
The busiest examiner, LE, EMILY M, is managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This action accounts for the entirety of the company's current pending workload. To advance the portfolio, it is necessary to address the specific technical and procedural requirements set forth by LE, EMILY M within the Chemistry & Materials domain, ensuring that all objections are met with precision.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the examination is proceeding under a specific set of technical guidelines. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the administrative oversight required is minimal, allowing for a more intensive focus on the 1 distinct examiner. Success depends on a precise response to the outstanding issues currently held by the assigned official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, EMILY M | 1 | 17.6% | -3.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17995741 | METHOD TO PRODUCE FOOD PRODUCTS AND FOOD PRODUCTS THUS OBTAINED | LE, EMILY M | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1793 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17995741 | METHOD TO PRODUCE FOOD PRODUCTS AND FOOD PRODUCTS THUS OBTAINED | LE, EMILY M | 1793 | §102 | Final Rejection | 33d | Pending | Oct 07, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial