Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sunflower Holdco, Inc. is currently addressing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The limited number of pending actions suggests a specific prosecution phase for the company's current filings. This concentration allows the company to tailor its responses to the specific examiner's history and the technical standards of the 1 art unit involved. Practitioners can observe that the company's current interactions with the patent office are limited to these specific parameters.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With a busiest examiner pending count of 1, this examiner is the point of contact for the company's active prosecution workload. All current legal efforts are focused on this 1 pending action within 1 art unit. Practitioners can prioritize understanding the specific preferences of this 1 distinct examiner to resolve the outstanding office action efficiently. This focus allows for an analysis of the examiner's past actions and the art unit's requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P | 1 | 36.3% | +32.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18259677 | EXTRACTS FROM OIL SEEDS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING OIL SEEDS | MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P | 11d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1793 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18259677 | EXTRACTS FROM OIL SEEDS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING OIL SEEDS | MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P | 1793 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Jun 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial