Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOORHIES, RACHEL A. | 1 | 95.6% | +4.4% |
| BINAS, JENNYLOU MATILLA | 1 | 95.4% | +3.6% |
| PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 1 | 41.4% | +24.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35521247 | Cleaning robot | BINAS, JENNYLOU MATILLA | 98d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17425957 | Order Picking Method and Device, and Storage Medium | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 569d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2953 | 1 |
| 2913 | 1 |
| 2178 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35521414 | Electronic device with cleaning settings graphical user interface | VOORHIES, RACHEL A. | 2953 | Other | Non-Final OA | 323d overdue | Pending | Mar 11, 2024 |
| 35521247 | Cleaning robot | BINAS, JENNYLOU MATILLA | 2913 | §102 | Final Rejection | 98d overdue | Pending | Mar 11, 2024 |
| 17425957 | Order Picking Method and Device, and Storage Medium | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 2178 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 569d overdue | Pending | Jul 27, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial