Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Tadano Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tadano Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which means that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This level of examiner diversity requires a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the unique requirements and technical interpretations of 3 different people.

The company's active matters are spread across 3 distinct art units. This distribution within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector suggests that the company's research and development efforts are being categorized into several different technical specialties. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy must account for the specific technical expertise and procedural norms of 3 different administrative divisions at the patent office.

DANG, TINH is identified as the busiest examiner for Tadano Ltd., currently overseeing 1 pending office action. While DANG, TINH is the busiest, they only manage 1 of the 3 total pending actions. This indicates that the portfolio's progress is not concentrated under any single individual. Practitioners should focus on the specific examiner histories for all matters to ensure that each of the 3 pending office actions is handled with an understanding of the assigned examiner's preferences.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DANG, TINH 1 85.4% +7.9%
JOHNS, HILARY LYNN 1 81.9% +15.7%
MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 1 30.7% +20.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796784 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SERVER, WORK MACHINE DISPLAY OPERATION APPLICATION, METHOD FOR PROVIDING MODEL INFORMATION, METHOD FOR ACQUIRING MODEL INFORMATION, AND MODEL INFORMATION ACQUISITION SYSTEM MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 68d
18872489 CRANE DANG, TINH —
18871817 CRANE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796784 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SERVER, WORK MACHINE DISPLAY OPERATION APPLICATION, METHOD FOR PROVIDING MODEL INFORMATION, METHOD FOR ACQUIRING MODEL INFORMATION, AND MODEL INFORMATION ACQUISITION SYSTEM MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 68d
18871817 CRANE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3655 1
3613 1
3625 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18872489 CRANE DANG, TINH 3655 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18871817 CRANE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN 3613 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
17796784 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SERVER, WORK MACHINE DISPLAY OPERATION APPLICATION, METHOD FOR PROVIDING MODEL INFORMATION, METHOD FOR ACQUIRING MODEL INFORMATION, AND MODEL INFORMATION ACQUISITION SYSTEM MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 3625 §101 Final Rejection 68d Pending Aug 01, 2022

Managing Tadano Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Tadano Ltd. have?

Tadano Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Tadano Ltd. applications?

Tinh Dang has the most, with 1 of Tadano Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Tadano Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month