Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Teachers Insurance And Annuity Association Of America

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 8 art units • 15 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Teachers Insurance And Annuity Association Of America currently manages 15 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 15 actions are distributed across 15 distinct examiners, which means that every single pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. The 8 distinct art units involved indicate that the company's intellectual property spans several specialized examination groups, requiring a strategy that accounts for different procedural nuances within the patent office.

Among the active personnel, Getachew, Wodajo is identified as the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 of the pending office actions. This assignment of 1 action to each examiner, including Getachew, Wodajo, highlights a completely decentralized prosecution environment for the portfolio. For a practitioner, the presence of 15 pending office actions across 8 distinct art units necessitates a versatile approach to prosecution, as each unit may apply different interpretations of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems guidelines.

The fact that 15 distinct examiners are handling 15 pending office actions implies that no institutional knowledge gained from one prosecution will carry over to others through examiner overlap. This lack of overlap, where Getachew, Wodajo and all other examiners manage only 1 pending action, means that individual examiner preferences will dictate the outcome of every case. Consequently, the 15 pending office actions represent a fragmented landscape where practitioners must engage with 15 different individuals across 8 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (60%)
5
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (7%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (20%)
§101 + other4 (27%)
§103 only5 (33%)
§112 only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (13%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
47% of docket
3
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GETACHEW, WODAJO 1 40.8% +38.6%
MILLER, JAMES H 1 40.9% +36.5%
SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 1 30.4% +28.2%
TORRES CHANZA, GABRIEL JOSE 1 10.0% -14.3%
MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES 1 67.2% +41.8%
KANAAN, TONY P 1 28.7% +27.9%
HOANG, HIEU T 1 80.9% +16.3%
TRUONG, LAN DAI T 1 91.2% +11.5%
PHAM, JESSICA THUY 1 18.2% +90.0%
KING, DAVIDA LEE 1 35.6% +36.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18637972 TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MEDIATED CURATION OF ACCESS AND CONTENT WITHIN A CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM TRUONG, LAN DAI T —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18243714 RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATING EXTENDED REALITY TO GENERATE PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z 29d
19574205 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - BLOCKCHAIN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT GETACHEW, WODAJO —
19262651 MANAGING INCOME STREAMS USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SOULBOUND TOKENS MILLER, JAMES H —
18952523 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TECHNICAL DEBT RISK MANAGEMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TORRES CHANZA, GABRIEL JOSE —
18765022 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO IDENTIFY FRICTION EVENTS DURING AN ELECTRONIC JOURNEY OF A CUSTOMER OF A BUSINESS KANAAN, TONY P —
18643720 TECHNIQUES FOR LEVERAGING PROOF-OF-CONTRIBUTION ON A DISTRIBUTED CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM HOANG, HIEU T —
18404155 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESPONSIBLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PHAM, JESSICA THUY —
18392059 DYNAMICALLY MAPPING APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES KESSLER, GREGORY AARON —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18400778 Techniques for Preserving Memories and Experiences Through a Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Engine KING, DAVIDA LEE 3d overdue
19574205 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - BLOCKCHAIN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT GETACHEW, WODAJO —
19262651 MANAGING INCOME STREAMS USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SOULBOUND TOKENS MILLER, JAMES H —
18981392 AUTOMATED TECHNICAL DEBT EVALUATION AND SCORING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SINGLETARY, TYRONE E —
18889583 ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING, IDENTIFYING, AND TRACKING TECHNICAL DEBT IN ORGANIZATIONS MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES —
18765022 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO IDENTIFY FRICTION EVENTS DURING AN ELECTRONIC JOURNEY OF A CUSTOMER OF A BUSINESS KANAAN, TONY P —
18643720 TECHNIQUES FOR LEVERAGING PROOF-OF-CONTRIBUTION ON A DISTRIBUTED CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM HOANG, HIEU T —
18637972 TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MEDIATED CURATION OF ACCESS AND CONTENT WITHIN A CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM TRUONG, LAN DAI T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 3
2197 3
3697 1
3694 1
3696 1
2449 1
2444 1
3699 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19574205 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - BLOCKCHAIN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT GETACHEW, WODAJO 3697 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2026
19262651 MANAGING INCOME STREAMS USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SOULBOUND TOKENS MILLER, JAMES H 3694 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2025
18981392 AUTOMATED TECHNICAL DEBT EVALUATION AND SCORING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 3625 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 13, 2024
18952523 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TECHNICAL DEBT RISK MANAGEMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TORRES CHANZA, GABRIEL JOSE 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18889583 ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING, IDENTIFYING, AND TRACKING TECHNICAL DEBT IN ORGANIZATIONS MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES 2197 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18765022 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO IDENTIFY FRICTION EVENTS DURING AN ELECTRONIC JOURNEY OF A CUSTOMER OF A BUSINESS KANAAN, TONY P 3696 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 05, 2024
18643720 TECHNIQUES FOR LEVERAGING PROOF-OF-CONTRIBUTION ON A DISTRIBUTED CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM HOANG, HIEU T 2449 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18637972 TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MEDIATED CURATION OF ACCESS AND CONTENT WITHIN A CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM TRUONG, LAN DAI T 2444 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 17, 2024
18404155 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESPONSIBLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PHAM, JESSICA THUY — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18400778 Techniques for Preserving Memories and Experiences Through a Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Engine KING, DAVIDA LEE 3699 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Dec 29, 2023
18392059 DYNAMICALLY MAPPING APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES KESSLER, GREGORY AARON 2197 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2023
18509923 GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INCLUDING MAPPING QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TSAI, JAMES T — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2023
18374913 OPERATING SYSTEM LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING UNG, LANNY N 2197 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 29, 2023
18243714 RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATING EXTENDED REALITY TO GENERATE PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Sep 08, 2023
18233674 SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING FOR AUTOMATED ASSISTANTS SITIRICHE, LUIS A — §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2023

Managing Teachers Insurance And Annuity Association Of America's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month