Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Tecmen Electronics Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. These 3 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. TRIEU, TIMOTHY K is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The concentration in 2 distinct art units despite having 3 distinct examiners suggests some technical overlap between the pending cases, even though they are being reviewed by different individuals.
The use of 3 distinct examiners for 3 actions means that the company must manage three different prosecution styles. However, because these actions are located within only 2 distinct art units, there is some concentration at the unit level. This requires a strategy that maintains technical consistency across the 2 art units while adapting to the individual preferences of each examiner. Because each examiner only handles 1 pending office action, no single person has a dominant influence over the portfolio. Practitioners should focus on the specific standards of the 2 art units while being prepared for the unique perspectives of 3 different examiners. This profile reflects a technically focused but personnel-diverse prosecution landscape.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRIEU, TIMOTHY K | 1 | 62.3% | +54.8% |
| PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M | 1 | 26.9% | +45.3% |
| KHONG, BRIAN THAI-BINH | 1 | 67.1% | +36.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19472607 | FLEXIBLE WELDING HELMET | TRIEU, TIMOTHY K | — |
| 18686383 | PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND PORTABLE POWERED AIR-PURIFYING RESPIRATOR THEREFOR | PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19472607 | FLEXIBLE WELDING HELMET | TRIEU, TIMOTHY K | — |
| 18686383 | PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND PORTABLE POWERED AIR-PURIFYING RESPIRATOR THEREFOR | PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M | — |
| 18006550 | ELECTRIC BREATHING APPARATUS AND AIR FILTER DEVICE THEREFOR | KHONG, BRIAN THAI-BINH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| 3785 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19472607 | FLEXIBLE WELDING HELMET | TRIEU, TIMOTHY K | 3732 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 03, 2025 |
| 18686383 | PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND PORTABLE POWERED AIR-PURIFYING RESPIRATOR THEREFOR | PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 23, 2024 |
| 18006550 | ELECTRIC BREATHING APPARATUS AND AIR FILTER DEVICE THEREFOR | KHONG, BRIAN THAI-BINH | 3785 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial