Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Texas Medical Center

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Texas Medical Center is managing 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the center's innovations are being evaluated by several different technical teams. This distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests a diverse range of mechanical and systems technologies that require specialized review from multiple examination groups. The presence of 4 pending office actions shows a moderate level of current activity in this technical sector. This structure ensures that the center's applications are being reviewed in multiple technical environments.

WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. The portfolio is characterized by a high degree of examiner diversity, as there are 4 distinct examiners for the 4 pending office actions. This 1 to 1 ratio of examiners to actions means that no single individual has a concentrated influence over the center's pending applications. By interacting with 4 distinct examiners, the center is exposed to a variety of examination styles and interpretations of patentability within its chosen technology area across 3 distinct art units. This distribution helps to diversify its patenting risk.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK 1 79.3% +13.8%
MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 1 49.0% +49.0%
FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 1 73.0% +20.4%
KANAAN, LIZA TONY 1 23.4% +31.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18860528 PROLONGED AIR LEAK PERCEPTION MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 35d
18870906 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING AIRWAY EVENTS WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK —
17995657 SYSTEM FOR DELIVERING TARGETED CONTENT WITH CARE PREFERENCE SUGGESTIONS KANAAN, LIZA TONY —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18571170 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERRUPTING NERVE ACTIVITY TO TREAT A MEDICAL CONDITION FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 33d
18860528 PROLONGED AIR LEAK PERCEPTION MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 35d
18870906 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING AIRWAY EVENTS WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK —
17995657 SYSTEM FOR DELIVERING TARGETED CONTENT WITH CARE PREFERENCE SUGGESTIONS KANAAN, LIZA TONY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3682 1
3794 1
3683 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18870906 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING AIRWAY EVENTS WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18860528 PROLONGED AIR LEAK PERCEPTION MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 3682 §101§102 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Oct 25, 2024
18571170 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERRUPTING NERVE ACTIVITY TO TREAT A MEDICAL CONDITION FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 3794 §102 Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 15, 2023
17995657 SYSTEM FOR DELIVERING TARGETED CONTENT WITH CARE PREFERENCE SUGGESTIONS KANAAN, LIZA TONY 3683 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2022

Managing Texas Medical Center's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month