Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

THE AEROSPACE Corporation

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

THE AEROSPACE Corporation currently has 7 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 7 actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is reviewing 1 application. The portfolio is also spread across 6 distinct art units, indicating a high level of technical diversity for a portfolio of this size.

The busiest examiner, COOK, WILLIAM J, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 7 pending office actions split among 7 distinct examiners, there is no concentration of work under any 1 individual. The presence of 6 distinct art units for only 7 pending actions shows that the company's research is being evaluated by almost as many specialized groups as there are pending matters. For practitioners, this high level of dispersion across both 7 examiners and 6 art units means that prosecution strategies must be highly individualized for each application. There is very little opportunity to apply lessons learned from 1 examiner or art unit to the rest of the pending portfolio, as 6 out of the 7 actions are in different units and all 7 are with different examiners. This requires a broad and flexible approach to prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
1
Medium (14%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (29%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
29% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COOK, WILLIAM J 1 86.2% +11.0%
MERCADO, ALEXANDER A 1 69.4% +19.6%
LEE, SHUN K 1 42.2% +16.3%
GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 1 40.0% +66.7%
NGUYEN, CHAU T 1 67.9% +30.5%
SILVA, MICHAEL THOMAS 1 33.0% +23.9%
AYAD, TAMIR 1 42.3% +47.9%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18184428 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINING USING FEATURE SPACE ANALYSIS GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 49d overdue
18968574 DYNAMIC FLEXIBLE CIRCUITS COOK, WILLIAM J —
18308132 PORTABLE GAMMA RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) LEE, SHUN K —
17960019 MALLEABLE CONFIDENCE MODELS AND MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION NGUYEN, CHAU T —
16860658 THERMOELECTRIC ARRAY AYAD, TAMIR —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18184428 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINING USING FEATURE SPACE ANALYSIS GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 49d overdue
18968574 DYNAMIC FLEXIBLE CIRCUITS COOK, WILLIAM J —
18733698 WIRELESS BATTERY LEAK DETECTION MERCADO, ALEXANDER A —
18308132 PORTABLE GAMMA RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) LEE, SHUN K —
17960019 MALLEABLE CONFIDENCE MODELS AND MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION NGUYEN, CHAU T —
16932418 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ORBIT ESTIMATION OF A SATELLITE SILVA, MICHAEL THOMAS —
16860658 THERMOELECTRIC ARRAY AYAD, TAMIR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2855 1
2884 1
2121 1
2100 1
3663 1
1726 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18968574 DYNAMIC FLEXIBLE CIRCUITS COOK, WILLIAM J — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18733698 WIRELESS BATTERY LEAK DETECTION MERCADO, ALEXANDER A 2855 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 04, 2024
18308132 PORTABLE GAMMA RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) LEE, SHUN K 2884 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 27, 2023
18184428 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINING USING FEATURE SPACE ANALYSIS GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 2121 §101§103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Mar 15, 2023
17960019 MALLEABLE CONFIDENCE MODELS AND MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION NGUYEN, CHAU T 2100 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2022
16932418 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ORBIT ESTIMATION OF A SATELLITE SILVA, MICHAEL THOMAS 3663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2020
16860658 THERMOELECTRIC ARRAY AYAD, TAMIR 1726 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 28, 2020

Managing THE AEROSPACE Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month