Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

The Bank of New York Mellon

Technology area: Computing & Software

10 pending office actions • 6 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Bank of New York Mellon maintains a portfolio with 10 pending office actions, all within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 10 distinct examiners, meaning every single pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution of examiners is paired with 6 distinct art units.

The busiest examiner, LIN, KATHERINE Y, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 10 pending office actions and 10 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds more than one case. This indicates a variety of technical sub-specialties within the Computing & Software field, requiring the applicant to manage 10 separate examiner relationships.

Navigating 6 distinct art units requires an adaptable prosecution strategy. Since each of the 10 pending office actions is with a different examiner, practitioners cannot rely on a single examiner's past behavior to predict outcomes across the whole portfolio. Each of the 10 actions must be handled as a unique interaction within its respective art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (70%)
2
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§101 + other5 (50%)
§103 only2 (20%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
60% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
10% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIN, KATHERINE Y 1 90.8% +6.5%
SETH, MANAV 1 90.7% +8.0%
APONTE, FRANCISCO JAVIER 1 88.3% +24.2%
ALAM, SHIHAB 1 — —
SHELTON, GABRIELLA KANANI 1 73.9% +24.6%
YU, ARIEL J 1 40.3% +27.4%
WU, NICHOLAS S 1 52.4% +31.4%
MULLINAX, CLINT LEE 1 47.3% +37.3%
BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 1 92.3% +20.0%
KWON, JUN 1 41.0% +47.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18979911 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE, TEMPLATE-INDEPENDENT HANDWRITING EXTRACTION FROM IMAGES USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS SETH, MANAV —
18790613 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSLATING A FIRST CODING LANGUAGE INTO A SECOND CODING LANGUAGE APONTE, FRANCISCO JAVIER —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17159868 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS THAT GENERATE CLUSTER-SPECIFIC TEMPORAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR TIME SERIES DATA IN COMPUTER NETWORKS KWON, JUN 13d
18344541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BREAK RESOLUTION AUTOMATION YU, ARIEL J 14d
19017203 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR APPLICATION FAILOVER AUTOMATION LIN, KATHERINE Y 15d
18623521 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING DECOUPLED DISTRIBUTION FROM A MAINFRAME TO DISTRIBUTED PLATFORMS ALAM, SHIHAB —
18601183 SELF-HEALING AUTOMATIONS WITH SELF-SERVICE ARCHITECTURE SHELTON, GABRIELLA KANANI —
18096243 SEGMENTED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MODELING WITH PERIOD-OVER-PERIOD ANALYSIS MULLINAX, CLINT LEE —
17940159 MAPPING ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS TO DATA FOR DEEP LEARNING BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17159868 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS THAT GENERATE CLUSTER-SPECIFIC TEMPORAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR TIME SERIES DATA IN COMPUTER NETWORKS KWON, JUN 13d
18344541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BREAK RESOLUTION AUTOMATION YU, ARIEL J 14d
18790613 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSLATING A FIRST CODING LANGUAGE INTO A SECOND CODING LANGUAGE APONTE, FRANCISCO JAVIER —
18601183 SELF-HEALING AUTOMATIONS WITH SELF-SERVICE ARCHITECTURE SHELTON, GABRIELLA KANANI —
18166696 DIRECTIONAL DRIVERS OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS BASED ON MODEL GRADIENTS WU, NICHOLAS S —
18096243 SEGMENTED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MODELING WITH PERIOD-OVER-PERIOD ANALYSIS MULLINAX, CLINT LEE —
17940159 MAPPING ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS TO DATA FOR DEEP LEARNING BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2113 2
3627 1
2148 1
2123 1
2126 1
2127 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19017203 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR APPLICATION FAILOVER AUTOMATION LIN, KATHERINE Y 2113 §101Other Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 10, 2025
18979911 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE, TEMPLATE-INDEPENDENT HANDWRITING EXTRACTION FROM IMAGES USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS SETH, MANAV — §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2024
18790613 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSLATING A FIRST CODING LANGUAGE INTO A SECOND CODING LANGUAGE APONTE, FRANCISCO JAVIER — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18623521 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING DECOUPLED DISTRIBUTION FROM A MAINFRAME TO DISTRIBUTED PLATFORMS ALAM, SHIHAB — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18601183 SELF-HEALING AUTOMATIONS WITH SELF-SERVICE ARCHITECTURE SHELTON, GABRIELLA KANANI 2113 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 11, 2024
18344541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BREAK RESOLUTION AUTOMATION YU, ARIEL J 3627 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jun 29, 2023
18166696 DIRECTIONAL DRIVERS OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS BASED ON MODEL GRADIENTS WU, NICHOLAS S 2148 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 09, 2023
18096243 SEGMENTED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MODELING WITH PERIOD-OVER-PERIOD ANALYSIS MULLINAX, CLINT LEE 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 12, 2023
17940159 MAPPING ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS TO DATA FOR DEEP LEARNING BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 2126 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 08, 2022
17159868 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS THAT GENERATE CLUSTER-SPECIFIC TEMPORAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR TIME SERIES DATA IN COMPUTER NETWORKS KWON, JUN 2127 §103§112 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jan 27, 2021

Managing The Bank of New York Mellon's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month