Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health has 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are assigned to 3 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units, which means each pending application is being evaluated by a different individual in a different technical group. This distribution suggests the 3 pending cases involve diverse biotech or pharmaceutical concepts. Practitioners must prepare for three separate examination styles, as the 3 distinct art units likely apply different standards and prior art searches to the biotechnology-related claims.

DIAMOND, ALAN D is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. With 3 distinct examiners each handling one case, the workload is evenly distributed across the assigned staff. The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the authority's biotechnology innovations are multifaceted, requiring specialized review from several different departments. Counsel should treat each of the 3 pending office actions as an independent effort, as the lack of examiner overlap means that arguments successful in one case may not influence the others.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIAMOND, ALAN D 1 71.5% +8.5%
PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1 69.2% +18.5%
NEAGU, IRINA 1 46.7% +57.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517818 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PRETARGETED IMMUNOTHERAPY PUTTLITZ, KARL J —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517818 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PRETARGETED IMMUNOTHERAPY PUTTLITZ, KARL J —
18044747 RIBITOL TREATMENT NEAGU, IRINA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3991 1
1646 1
1629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19265435 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY AND OTHER DISORDERS DIAMOND, ALAN D 3991 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2025
18517818 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PRETARGETED IMMUNOTHERAPY PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1646 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2023
18044747 RIBITOL TREATMENT NEAGU, IRINA 1629 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 09, 2023

Managing The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health have?

The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health applications?

Alan D Diamond has the most, with 1 of The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health's pending office actions.

What technology area are The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority D/B/A Atrium Health's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month