Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's applications are being reviewed by different examiners within the same technical group, which may offer consistency in the technical prior art being cited.
LEIBOVICH, YAIR is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. With 2 pending actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for one application. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit may provide consistency in the technical standards applied to the applications, even though 2 different examiners are conducting the reviews. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the examination styles of the 2 distinct examiners within this 1 art unit. This strategy can help in developing a unified technical argument that satisfies the standards of the 1 art unit while addressing the individual concerns of each examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEIBOVICH, YAIR | 1 | 89.9% | +11.0% |
| THAI, HANH B | 1 | 87.1% | +2.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19001037 | MASTER INGESTION AND DATA AUTOMATION PROCESS AND SYSTEM | THAI, HANH B | 46d overdue |
| 19098486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CIPHER-CODED DATETIME-BASED DATA LATENCY TRACING IN END-TO-END DATA PROCESSING PIPELINES | LEIBOVICH, YAIR | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19098486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CIPHER-CODED DATETIME-BASED DATA LATENCY TRACING IN END-TO-END DATA PROCESSING PIPELINES | LEIBOVICH, YAIR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19098486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CIPHER-CODED DATETIME-BASED DATA LATENCY TRACING IN END-TO-END DATA PROCESSING PIPELINES | LEIBOVICH, YAIR | — | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 02, 2025 |
| 19001037 | MASTER INGESTION AND DATA AUTOMATION PROCESS AND SYSTEM | THAI, HANH B | 2154 | §101 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | Dec 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial