Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Trinity College Dublin

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Trinity College Dublin currently has 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating a diverse range of technical focus. This level of dispersion is notable for a small number of cases, as it means every pending application is being reviewed in a different art unit by a different examiner. Such a broad distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests that the university's research and patenting efforts cover a variety of disparate technologies within the chemistry sector.

The busiest examiner is OMORI, MARY I, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is split, with each examiner managing one action. This structure minimizes the impact of any single examiner on the overall portfolio. However, it also requires the university to manage 3 distinct prosecution tracks simultaneously, each with its own set of art unit trends and examiner preferences. The lack of overlap among the 3 distinct examiners means that success in one case may not necessarily provide a roadmap for the others, necessitating a tailored approach for each application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OMORI, MARY I 1 50.9% +57.3%
GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 1 64.4% +38.8%
POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 1 51.3% +36.1%
WEHBE, ANNE MARIE SABRINA 1 57.2% +43.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17797684 POLE PIECE FOR A TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 91d overdue
18840433 RECYCLABLE METAL COMPOSITE SHEETS, THEIR USES, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE OMORI, MARY I —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17797684 POLE PIECE FOR A TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 91d overdue
17429838 A PRODUCT AND METHOD FOR POWDER FEEDING IN POWDER BED 3D PRINTERS POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 66d overdue
16264095 AAV-BASED GENE THERAPY FOR GLAUCOMA WEHBE, ANNE MARIE SABRINA 3d overdue
18840433 RECYCLABLE METAL COMPOSITE SHEETS, THEIR USES, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE OMORI, MARY I —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1784 1
2881 1
1738 1
1634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18840433 RECYCLABLE METAL COMPOSITE SHEETS, THEIR USES, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE OMORI, MARY I 1784 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2024
17797684 POLE PIECE FOR A TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 2881 §103§112 Final Rejection 91d overdue Pending Aug 04, 2022
17429838 A PRODUCT AND METHOD FOR POWDER FEEDING IN POWDER BED 3D PRINTERS POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 1738 §103 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Aug 10, 2021
16264095 AAV-BASED GENE THERAPY FOR GLAUCOMA WEHBE, ANNE MARIE SABRINA 1634 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Jan 31, 2019

Managing Trinity College Dublin's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month