Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
The University of Memphis Research Foundation currently manages 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This active matter is assigned to examiner NGUYEN, NAM P, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The concentration of work under this examiner suggests a highly focused prosecution effort for this company. This arrangement allows the applicant to concentrate their resources on a point of contact within the patent office.
The portfolio is distributed across 1 distinct art unit and involves 1 distinct examiner. Because the busiest examiner handles 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy relies entirely on the interactions with NGUYEN, NAM P. Practitioners should monitor this specific examiner's historical trends to anticipate the likely trajectory of the application. Understanding the specific procedural preferences of the 1 distinct art unit involved will also be critical for achieving a favorable outcome. Addressing the specific requirements of the 1 pending office action will be the primary focus of the next prosecution phase.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, NAM P | 1 | 54.8% | +48.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18132746 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES WITH NANOPARTICLES | NGUYEN, NAM P | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1678 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18132746 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES WITH NANOPARTICLES | NGUYEN, NAM P | 1678 | §103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Apr 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial