Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The University of Sheffield

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Sheffield maintains a portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. There are currently 5 pending office actions associated with this entity. These actions are spread across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This distribution suggests that the university's research in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals covers 5 technical classifications within the patent office.

DIAS, RAVEEN J is the busiest examiner for the university, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because there are 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the workload is distributed with each examiner handling 1 action. This 1 to 1 ratio between examiners and pending actions means that the prosecution strategy involves 5 different individual perspectives. The presence of 5 distinct art units reinforces the observation that the university's intellectual property is being evaluated by 5 groups within the USPTO. This environment requires managing interactions across 5 distinct administrative units simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIAS, RAVEEN J 1 80.7% +17.3%
BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN 1 51.2% +47.0%
NGUYEN, NAM P 1 54.8% +48.7%
BOSWORTH, KAMI A 1 69.1% +28.7%
ADLAM, CHANTAL PETA-GAYE 1 53.5% +27.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17779872 GUIDING DEVICE FOR A VASCULAR CATHETER BOSWORTH, KAMI A 29d overdue
18521941 SPOOL TENSION COUPLING, SYSTEM AND METHOD DIAS, RAVEEN J —
18271980 METHODS OF PREDICTING PROGRESSION OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE NGUYEN, NAM P —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17286797 TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE ADLAM, CHANTAL PETA-GAYE 49d overdue
17779872 GUIDING DEVICE FOR A VASCULAR CATHETER BOSWORTH, KAMI A 29d overdue
18521941 SPOOL TENSION COUPLING, SYSTEM AND METHOD DIAS, RAVEEN J —
18286040 PERIVASCULAR ACCUMULATION OF IMMUNE CELLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CANCER BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN —
18271980 METHODS OF PREDICTING PROGRESSION OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE NGUYEN, NAM P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3654 1
1675 1
1678 1
3783 1
1622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18521941 SPOOL TENSION COUPLING, SYSTEM AND METHOD DIAS, RAVEEN J 3654 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2023
18286040 PERIVASCULAR ACCUMULATION OF IMMUNE CELLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CANCER BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN 1675 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2023
18271980 METHODS OF PREDICTING PROGRESSION OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE NGUYEN, NAM P 1678 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2023
17779872 GUIDING DEVICE FOR A VASCULAR CATHETER BOSWORTH, KAMI A 3783 §102§103 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending May 25, 2022
17286797 TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE ADLAM, CHANTAL PETA-GAYE 1622 §103DP Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Apr 19, 2021

Managing The University of Sheffield's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month