Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The Wave Talk Inc.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Wave Talk Inc. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a focused technical scope for the company's current filings, even as they are reviewed by different individuals.

AMARA, MOHAMED K is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents 1 of the 2 pending office actions currently active. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit despite having 2 distinct examiners suggests that the company's chemistry and materials matters are being evaluated by the same technical group. This allows for consistency in the technical standards applied, although the company must still navigate the individual preferences of 2 distinct examiners within that single art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AMARA, MOHAMED K 1 75.8% +29.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19188378 BIOFILM THICKNESS MEASURING DEVICE AMARA, MOHAMED K —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19188378 BIOFILM THICKNESS MEASURING DEVICE AMARA, MOHAMED K —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19188378 BIOFILM THICKNESS MEASURING DEVICE AMARA, MOHAMED K — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 24, 2025

Managing The Wave Talk Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month