Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI | 1 | 71.5% | +20.4% |
| SHANG, ANNAN Q | 1 | 70.8% | +10.8% |
| HICKS, CHARLES N | 1 | 74.7% | +16.4% |
| FLYNN, RANDY A | 1 | 65.2% | +16.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18130891 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A CONTENT SELECTION INTERFACE | FLYNN, RANDY A | 19d |
| 18622379 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A VIRTUAL CHANNEL | SHANG, ANNAN Q | 30d |
| 18622420 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING DESCRIPTIVE PERSONA TEXT | EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI | 55d |
| 18130815 | AFFINITY PROFILE SYSTEM AND METHOD | HICKS, CHARLES N | 75d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2424 | 3 |
| 2425 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18622420 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING DESCRIPTIVE PERSONA TEXT | EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI | 2425 | §103 | Final Rejection | 55d | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18622379 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A VIRTUAL CHANNEL | SHANG, ANNAN Q | 2424 | §102 | Final Rejection | 30d | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18130815 | AFFINITY PROFILE SYSTEM AND METHOD | HICKS, CHARLES N | 2424 | §103 | Final Rejection | 75d | Pending | Apr 04, 2023 |
| 18130891 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A CONTENT SELECTION INTERFACE | FLYNN, RANDY A | 2424 | §103 | Final Rejection | 19d | Pending | Apr 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial