Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Tmy Technology Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tmy Technology Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The limited scope of 1 pending office action suggests a highly targeted prosecution effort. Because all activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, the company's current legal strategy is focused on a specific technical niche within the semiconductor field.

The busiest examiner for the company is NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending action. As there is only 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN is the only examiner currently interacting with the company's representatives. Success for this portfolio depends on navigating the requirements of this 1 distinct examiner. The lack of examiner variety means that the company does not currently face the challenge of reconciling different examiner interpretations across different filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 1 62.5% +16.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18167893 RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT HAVING ERROR DETECTION CAPABILITY NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 43d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2858 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18167893 RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT HAVING ERROR DETECTION CAPABILITY NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 2858 §103 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Feb 13, 2023

Managing Tmy Technology Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month