Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Tocalo Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tocalo Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a diverse range of technical subject matter. The busiest examiner is EMPIE, NATHAN H, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. The use of 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions ensures that the prosecution workload is not concentrated under a single individual, providing a more balanced risk profile for the portfolio.

Furthermore, the involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's filings cover multiple specialized areas within the chemistry field. This requires the applicant to manage different examination styles and technical expectations across the 2 pending office actions. Because EMPIE, NATHAN H only handles 1 pending office action, the company must also engage with another distinct examiner to advance its overall patent strategy. This distribution requires a flexible approach to prosecution that can adapt to the specific requirements of each art unit.

With the current pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials sector, the company is actively pursuing protection for its material science innovations. The presence of multiple examiners and multiple art units means that the company's success is spread across different technical groups. This structure allows for a broader reach within the patent office, as the 2 pending matters are being evaluated independently. Practitioners should ensure that the technical arguments for each action are specifically tailored to the respective art unit's standards.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EMPIE, NATHAN H 1 43.5% +43.1%
LAW, NGA LEUNG V 1 56.7% +20.7%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18706873 SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD FOR CERAMIC THERMAL SPRAY COATING, AND CERAMIC THERMAL SPRAY COATING EMPIE, NATHAN H 46d overdue
18574476 COATING MATERIAL AND SURFACE COATING METHOD FOR IN-FURNACE STRUCTURE, AND IN-FURNACE STRUCTURE LAW, NGA LEUNG V 34d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1712 1
1717 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18706873 SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD FOR CERAMIC THERMAL SPRAY COATING, AND CERAMIC THERMAL SPRAY COATING EMPIE, NATHAN H 1712 §103 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending May 02, 2024
18574476 COATING MATERIAL AND SURFACE COATING METHOD FOR IN-FURNACE STRUCTURE, AND IN-FURNACE STRUCTURE LAW, NGA LEUNG V 1717 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Dec 27, 2023

Managing Tocalo Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month