Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Tomer Tal

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Tomer Tal has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, SISAY YACOB, and 1 distinct art unit. YACOB is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The current prosecution profile for this portfolio is limited to this unique pending matter, reflecting a highly specific and focused patent interest.

The involvement of only 1 distinct examiner and art unit means that the prosecution process is entirely centralized. YACOB's individual examination style and the specific practices of the assigned art unit are the only external factors currently influencing the portfolio's progress. This simplicity allows for a dedicated focus on the specific technical and legal issues raised in this unique pending action. Practitioners should prioritize a detailed analysis of YACOB's history within the communications sector to ensure the most effective response for this unique active case, as there are no other pending matters to manage.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YACOB, SISAY 1 76.9% +17.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18980679 CONTACT SENSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF YACOB, SISAY 43d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2686 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18980679 CONTACT SENSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF YACOB, SISAY 2686 §103 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Dec 13, 2024

Managing Tomer Tal's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month