Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Toppan Printing Co. Ltd.

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LUO, KAN 2 64.1% +21.9%
KWAK, DEAN P 1 58.4% +38.2%
LANGHALS, RENEE C 1 58.7% +46.1%
WALLS, CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO 1 71.8% -0.6%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17458642 MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHOD KWAK, DEAN P 107d overdue
17369793 ADHESIVE EXAMINATION MARKER LANGHALS, RENEE C 81d overdue
17386453 SOLID-STATE BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL AND SOLID-STATE BATTERY USING THE SAME LUO, KAN 6d
17093514 POWER STORAGE DEVICE PACKAGING MATERIAL AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE USING THE PACKAGING MATERIAL LUO, KAN 23d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1751 3
1798 1
3797 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17458642 MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHOD KWAK, DEAN P 1798 §103 Final Rejection 107d overdue Pending Aug 27, 2021
17386453 SOLID-STATE BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL AND SOLID-STATE BATTERY USING THE SAME LUO, KAN 1751 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Jul 27, 2021
17369793 ADHESIVE EXAMINATION MARKER LANGHALS, RENEE C 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 81d overdue Pending Jul 07, 2021
17093514 POWER STORAGE DEVICE PACKAGING MATERIAL AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE USING THE PACKAGING MATERIAL LUO, KAN 1751 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Nov 09, 2020
14267212 PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE WALLS, CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO 1751 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending May 01, 2014

Managing Toppan Printing Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month