Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026

Toyo System Co., Ltd.

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other3 (50%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
67% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 1 80.5% +13.9%
NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 1 67.6% +23.9%
RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 1 26.2% +23.8%
ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 1 52.9% +52.9%
TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 1 50.0% +68.6%
NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE 1 70.3% +10.2%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17620278 STATE OUTPUT SYSTEM NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE 32d overdue
18290063 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 15d
18027242 BATTERY LEASE SYSTEM RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 21d
18580856 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN
17782786 SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, CHARGER, AND SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL METHOD TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17620278 STATE OUTPUT SYSTEM NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE 32d overdue
18290063 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 15d
18027242 BATTERY LEASE SYSTEM RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 21d
18580856 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN
17918876 USED BATTERY UNIT HOLDER, AND USED BATTERY UNIT STORAGE SYSTEM ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL
17782786 SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, CHARGER, AND SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL METHOD TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2857 3
3626 1
2859 1
2189 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18580856 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 2857 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 19, 2024
18290063 BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DEVICE AND BATTERY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 2857 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 15d Pending Nov 09, 2023
18027242 BATTERY LEASE SYSTEM RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3626 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Mar 20, 2023
17918876 USED BATTERY UNIT HOLDER, AND USED BATTERY UNIT STORAGE SYSTEM ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 2859 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 13, 2022
17782786 SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, CHARGER, AND SIMULATED BATTERY CONTROL METHOD TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 2189 §103§112 Final Rejection Pending Jun 06, 2022
17620278 STATE OUTPUT SYSTEM NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE 2857 §101 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Dec 17, 2021

Managing Toyo System Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month