Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Treon OY maintains a patent portfolio within the Communications technology area, currently characterized by the volume of active prosecution. The data shows 1 pending office action for the company. This activity is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and the distinct art unit, showing the current interactions with the USPTO. For practitioners, this means the immediate prosecution landscape is defined by the set of examiner preferences for Treon OY.
The busiest examiner for Treon OY is ODOM, CURTIS B, who is currently handling the busiest examiner pending office action. Because this action represents the company's pending workload, the examiner's specific approach to the Communications field will be the primary factor in the near-term progress of the portfolio. The presence of the distinct art unit further confirms that the intellectual property efforts are confined to the regulatory and technical silo within the patent office for Treon OY.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODOM, CURTIS B | 1 | 87.1% | +11.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17944835 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURATION OF WIRELESS NETWORK DEVICE | ODOM, CURTIS B | 43d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17944835 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURATION OF WIRELESS NETWORK DEVICE | ODOM, CURTIS B | 43d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17944835 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURATION OF WIRELESS NETWORK DEVICE | ODOM, CURTIS B | 2631 | §103 | Final Rejection | 43d overdue | Pending | Sep 14, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial