Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Trinseo Europe GmbH

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Trinseo Europe GmbH currently has 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are being handled by 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that no single official is responsible for more than one case. This arrangement requires the applicant to adapt to the specific preferences and legal interpretations of different individuals. The absence of examiner concentration suggests that the prosecution of these matters will proceed along independent tracks.

The company's active cases are distributed across 3 distinct art units, highlighting the technical variety within their chemical filings. This spread means that the applications may be subject to different internal guidelines and examination speeds. BHUSHAN, KUMAR R is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 pending office action. Since this busiest examiner is responsible for a single case, the workload is not concentrated in any one office.

For those managing the portfolio, the use of multiple examiners across various art units necessitates a careful review of all correspondence to ensure technical consistency. The fact that BHUSHAN, KUMAR R holds 1 pending action means that the other files are being reviewed by separate officials. This distribution provides a diversified exposure to the patent office's examination corps for the active cases currently in progress.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BHUSHAN, KUMAR R 1 73.5% +32.6%
RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 1 72.7% +11.8%
SHAH, SAMIR 1 36.7% +35.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18383277 HIGH HEAT ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS CONTAINING A FUNCTIONAL COMONOMER AS BINDERS FOR BATTERIES BHUSHAN, KUMAR R —
17417528 EXTREMELY LOW ODOR STYRENIC POLYMER COMPOSITION RODD, CHRISTOPHER M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18383277 HIGH HEAT ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS CONTAINING A FUNCTIONAL COMONOMER AS BINDERS FOR BATTERIES BHUSHAN, KUMAR R —
17417528 EXTREMELY LOW ODOR STYRENIC POLYMER COMPOSITION RODD, CHRISTOPHER M —
14781671 MULTILAYER POLYMER STRUCTURES SHAH, SAMIR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1728 1
1766 1
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18383277 HIGH HEAT ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS CONTAINING A FUNCTIONAL COMONOMER AS BINDERS FOR BATTERIES BHUSHAN, KUMAR R 1728 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 24, 2023
17417528 EXTREMELY LOW ODOR STYRENIC POLYMER COMPOSITION RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 1766 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 23, 2021
14781671 MULTILAYER POLYMER STRUCTURES SHAH, SAMIR 1787 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 01, 2015

Managing Trinseo Europe GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Trinseo Europe GmbH have?

Trinseo Europe GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Trinseo Europe GmbH applications?

Kumar R Bhushan has the most, with 1 of Trinseo Europe GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Trinseo Europe GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month