Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Trisco Icap Pty Ltd. maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, BEKKER, KELLY JO, who is the only examiner currently reviewing the portfolio. The existence of 1 pending action reflects the current scale of the company's active engagement with the patent office.
The portfolio involves 1 distinct art unit. BEKKER, KELLY JO is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, which constitutes the total current workload. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a highly specific technological scope for the company's current patent efforts. Practitioners should analyze the past decisions of the assigned examiner, as the outcome of this single matter will significantly impact the company's immediate patent landscape in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEKKER, KELLY JO | 1 | 16.7% | +35.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18245780 | FOOD GRADE THICKENER AND METHODS FOR TREATING SWALLOWING DISORDERS | BEKKER, KELLY JO | 149d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18245780 | FOOD GRADE THICKENER AND METHODS FOR TREATING SWALLOWING DISORDERS | BEKKER, KELLY JO | 149d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18245780 | FOOD GRADE THICKENER AND METHODS FOR TREATING SWALLOWING DISORDERS | BEKKER, KELLY JO | 1792 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 149d overdue | Pending | Mar 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial