Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

U.S. Bancorp

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 10 art units • 16 examiners • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 54 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

U.S. Bancorp currently manages 15 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 15 actions are distributed across 14 distinct examiners, which suggests a high degree of individual examiner variety relative to the total volume of pending matters. The 8 distinct art units involved indicate that the company's intellectual property spans several specialized examination groups, requiring a strategy that accounts for different procedural nuances within the patent office.

Among the active personnel, Brophy, Matthew J is identified as the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 2 of the pending office actions. This specific concentration of 2 actions with one individual contrasts with the broader distribution across the 14 distinct examiners assigned to the portfolio. For a practitioner, the presence of 15 pending office actions across 8 distinct art units necessitates a versatile approach to prosecution, as each unit may apply different interpretations of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems guidelines.

The fact that 14 distinct examiners are handling 15 pending office actions implies that most examiners are only managing a single case for this entity. This lack of examiner overlap, with the exception of Brophy, Matthew J and his 2 pending actions, means that institutional knowledge gained from one prosecution may not frequently carry over to others. Consequently, the 15 pending office actions represent a landscape where individual examiner preferences will likely dictate the pace and outcome of the majority of the applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (71%)
5
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only4 (24%)
§101 + other8 (47%)
§103 only4 (24%)
§102 only1 (6%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
6% of docket
3
Communications
18% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
47% of docket
5
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BROPHY, MATTHEW J 2 68.5% +34.3%
ZHANG, DUAN 1 60.8% +18.6%
DURAN, ARTHUR D 1 15.8% +23.6%
HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 1 76.7% +21.1%
EDMONDS, DONALD J 1 39.7% +35.9%
SPOONER, LAMONT M 1 73.6% +12.0%
SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z 1 52.5% +31.5%
NGUYEN, TIEN C 1 68.1% +18.5%
NEWLON, WILLIAM D 1 46.6% +28.2%
FU, HAO 1 50.1% +24.8%

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18799689 PROFILE BASED ARRANGEMENTS AND METHODS FOR DISPARATE NETWORK SYSTEMS HAMILTON, SARA CHANDLER 4d overdue
18428783 AMBIENT TRANSACTION SYSTEM VIG, NARESH 16d
19635665 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING A NODAL DATA STRUCTURE FOR FRAUD DETECTION RING ZHANG, DUAN —
19556040 CIRCUIT-BASED TRANSACTION WITH SECURE-ACCESS PROCESSING DURAN, ARTHUR D —
19361282 IMPROVING CONTENT EDITING SOFTWARE VIA AUTOMATIC AND AUDITABLE AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION EDMONDS, DONALD J —
19281126 AUTONOMOUS TRACKING OF DISPARATE ASSETS SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z —
19267178 MOBILE CHECK DEPOSIT NGUYEN, TIEN C —
19092850 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT NEWLON, WILLIAM D —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18493619 CROSS-CHAIN BRIDGE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT BROPHY, MATTHEW J 83d
19635665 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING A NODAL DATA STRUCTURE FOR FRAUD DETECTION RING ZHANG, DUAN —
19556040 CIRCUIT-BASED TRANSACTION WITH SECURE-ACCESS PROCESSING DURAN, ARTHUR D —
19443928 IMAGE READING SYSTEMS, METHODS AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PERFORMING ENTITY EXTRACTION, GROUPING AND VALIDATION HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M —
19361282 IMPROVING CONTENT EDITING SOFTWARE VIA AUTOMATIC AND AUDITABLE AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION EDMONDS, DONALD J —
19349868 REMEDIATING HALLUCINATIONS IN LANGUAGE MODELS SPOONER, LAMONT M —
19281126 AUTONOMOUS TRACKING OF DISPARATE ASSETS SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z —
19267178 MOBILE CHECK DEPOSIT NGUYEN, TIEN C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3622 2
3695 2
3699 1
2671 1
3629 1
2657 1
3694 1
3624 1
2659 1
2191 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19635665 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING A NODAL DATA STRUCTURE FOR FRAUD DETECTION RING ZHANG, DUAN 3699 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2026
19556040 CIRCUIT-BASED TRANSACTION WITH SECURE-ACCESS PROCESSING DURAN, ARTHUR D 3622 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 04, 2026
19443928 IMAGE READING SYSTEMS, METHODS AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PERFORMING ENTITY EXTRACTION, GROUPING AND VALIDATION HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 2671 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 08, 2026
19361282 IMPROVING CONTENT EDITING SOFTWARE VIA AUTOMATIC AND AUDITABLE AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION EDMONDS, DONALD J 3629 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2025
19349868 REMEDIATING HALLUCINATIONS IN LANGUAGE MODELS SPOONER, LAMONT M 2657 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 03, 2025
19281126 AUTONOMOUS TRACKING OF DISPARATE ASSETS SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z — §101§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2025
19267178 MOBILE CHECK DEPOSIT NGUYEN, TIEN C 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2025
19092850 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT NEWLON, WILLIAM D — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
18930543 DETECTING AND REMEDIATING ANOMALIES IN INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS USING IMAGE PROCESSING FU, HAO 3695 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18921661 NETWORK-BASED REAL-TIME ENTERPRISE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18909206 AUTOMATED PIPELINE FOR TRAINING LANGUAGE MODELS SCHMIEDER, NICOLE A K 2659 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18799689 PROFILE BASED ARRANGEMENTS AND METHODS FOR DISPARATE NETWORK SYSTEMS HAMILTON, SARA CHANDLER 3695 §101§112Other Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Aug 09, 2024
18793460 SMART CONTRACT CREATION AND MANAGEMENT USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITH MODEL MERGING BROPHY, MATTHEW J — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2024
18733264 CONTEXTUALLY AUGMENTED TRANSFORMER NEURAL NETWORK MACKES, KRIS E — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2024
18632950 GENERATING INTERACTION SEQUENCE DISRUPTION PREDICTIONS HENRY, MATTHEW D — §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 11, 2024
18428783 AMBIENT TRANSACTION SYSTEM VIG, NARESH 3622 §101§103Other Final Rejection 16d Pending Jan 31, 2024
18493619 CROSS-CHAIN BRIDGE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT BROPHY, MATTHEW J 2191 §103 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Oct 24, 2023

Managing U.S. Bancorp's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month