Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
UDISENSE INC. shows 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. Prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a narrow administrative footprint for the company's pending matters at the patent office. The concentration in a single art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specialized or falls within a specific niche of the computing sector.
The busiest examiner identified is BURKE, TIONNA M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner handling the workload, the prosecution strategy is centralized. Practitioners can focus their attention on the specific requirements and tendencies of this single examiner. The busiest examiner pending figure of 1 confirms that there is no distribution of the workload across other officials, making the examiner's individual feedback the primary factor in the current prosecution phase.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURKE, TIONNA M | 1 | 53.6% | +20.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17987892 | Indicating Baby torticollis using child growth monitoring system | BURKE, TIONNA M | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17987892 | Indicating Baby torticollis using child growth monitoring system | BURKE, TIONNA M | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2178 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17987892 | Indicating Baby torticollis using child growth monitoring system | BURKE, TIONNA M | 2178 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Nov 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial