Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
ULTRADISPLAY INC. has a patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This single action represents the company's entire active prosecution workload, suggesting a very specific technical focus or a nascent stage of portfolio development.
The examination is being conducted within 1 distinct art unit. PIZIALI, JEFFREY J is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 1 pending office action. Since the busiest examiner pending count is 1, this examiner is responsible for the only active matter in the portfolio. Their individual expertise in communications technology will be the primary influence on the success of the application.
For a practitioner, the presence of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution strategy must be highly targeted. There are no other pending cases to provide insight into how different examiners might view the company's technology. Success depends on understanding the specific tendencies of this one examiner and the prior art typically cited within their art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 1 | 42.6% | +5.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18744747 | ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DISPLAYER AND DRIVER CIRCUIT AND PIXEL CIRCUIT AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18744747 | ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DISPLAYER AND DRIVER CIRCUIT AND PIXEL CIRCUIT AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 2628 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Jun 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial