Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ultrasonic Technology solutions operates within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently manages 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a concentrated prosecution environment for the company's current patent applications.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TEITELBAUM, DAVID J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is 1 pending action in total, this examiner oversees the entire active prosecution profile. This singular focus means that the company's immediate patenting outcomes are tied to the specific interpretations of this one examiner.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical scope of the pending application is narrow. Practitioners should prepare for a consistent examination process, as the data shows no other examiners or art units are currently active. This creates a focused but singular point of engagement within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | 1 | 68.7% | +24.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18362456 | Higher Efficiency, Demand Flexible Refrigeration or Heat Pump Systems with On Demand Vibrational Deicing Technology | TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3763 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18362456 | Higher Efficiency, Demand Flexible Refrigeration or Heat Pump Systems with On Demand Vibrational Deicing Technology | TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | 3763 | §103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Jul 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial