Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Universite Mohamed VI Polytechnique manages a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action, which represents the current focus of the university's patent prosecution efforts. This single action indicates that the university is currently navigating the examination process for 1 specific set of claims or a single application.
The prosecution is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner. This examiner is situated within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a concentrated technical focus within the broader Chemistry & Materials field. LI, JUN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This individual is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently awaiting a response or decision.
The busiest examiner pending count is 1, meaning that all active prosecution for the university is centralized under one official. This arrangement can simplify the management of the portfolio, as the university only needs to address the requirements of 1 distinct examiner. However, it also means that the university's immediate success in the Chemistry & Materials sector is dependent on the outcome of this single interaction.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LI, JUN | 1 | 54.6% | +56.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1732 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial