Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN currently has 4 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The prosecution of these matters is highly decentralized, involving 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. This suggests a broad range of technical subject matter that spans multiple specialized divisions at the USPTO, requiring a diverse set of legal and technical arguments to advance the portfolio.

KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY is the busiest examiner for the university, holding 1 pending office action. Because there are 4 pending office actions in total, each of the 4 distinct examiners is responsible for exactly one action. This distribution means that no single examiner or art unit has a dominant influence over the university's current patent prosecution, which may reduce the risk of a single examiner's bias affecting the entire portfolio.

The involvement of 4 distinct art units indicates that the university's innovations in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals are being evaluated by four different technical teams. Practitioners must manage four separate examiner relationships simultaneously. With 1 pending office action assigned to each examiner, the university faces a diverse set of procedural and technical requirements across its active portfolio. This decentralized structure requires careful coordination to ensure consistency in prosecution strategy across the 4 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY 1 52.8% +1.1%
KOMATSU, LI N 1 59.8% +71.1%
CHEN, STACY BROWN 1 66.1% +40.6%
KWAK, DEAN P 1 58.7% +37.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263335 ANTIBIOTIC NATURAL PRODUCT ANALOGUES KOMATSU, LI N —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17928339 ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS KWAK, DEAN P 9d overdue
18359526 DNA-STABILISED METAL CLUSTER BASED NUCLEIC ACID-SENSOR WITH DISTINCT EMISSION COLOUR AND INTENSITY CHANGE UPON TARGET RECOGNITION CHEN, STACY BROWN 50d
18263335 ANTIBIOTIC NATURAL PRODUCT ANALOGUES KOMATSU, LI N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1693 1
1658 1
1672 1
1798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18553278 INHIBITORS OF NICOTINAMIDE N-METHYL TRANSFERASE (NNMT) KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY 1693 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18263335 ANTIBIOTIC NATURAL PRODUCT ANALOGUES KOMATSU, LI N 1658 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2023
18359526 DNA-STABILISED METAL CLUSTER BASED NUCLEIC ACID-SENSOR WITH DISTINCT EMISSION COLOUR AND INTENSITY CHANGE UPON TARGET RECOGNITION CHEN, STACY BROWN 1672 §102 Final Rejection 50d Pending Jul 26, 2023
17928339 ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS KWAK, DEAN P 1798 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Nov 29, 2022

Managing UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month