Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

University of Kansas

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

10 pending office actions • 10 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

University of Kansas has 12 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters are assigned to 12 distinct examiners and 12 distinct art units, showing that each pending action has its own examiner and art-unit assignment. The profile therefore reflects broad administrative distribution rather than concentration in a shared examination setting.

IP, JASON M is the busiest examiner listed, with 1 pending matter. Because no examiner holds more than that listed share, counsel should use a distributed docket-management approach. Centralized review can preserve consistent disclosure and claim positions, while response preparation remains tailored to the separate examiner and art-unit contexts.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only4 (40%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
80% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
10% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
IP, JASON M 1 55.5% +24.9%
MELLER, MICHAEL V 1 47.2% +28.0%
BARSKY, JARED 1 50.3% +22.8%
CRUM, VIVIAN FLORENCE 1 100.0% +0.0%
CARR, DEBORAH D 1 81.8% +2.9%
KIM, EUNHEE 1 77.3% +12.2%
HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 1 0.0% +0.0%
NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 1 23.4% +30.3%
ARMSTRONG, SUSANNAH SIPPLE 1 30.0% +53.1%
LOPEZLIRA, ASHLEY NICOLE 1 70.2% +36.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18537021 FORWARD OSMOSIS PROCESS TO INCREASE THE CONCENTRATION OF A DILUTE METAL SALT SOLUTION AND RELATED PROCESSES CRUM, VIVIAN FLORENCE —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18278329 HYDROXYLATION OF ALKANES USING OZONE CARR, DEBORAH D 2d overdue
18779564 TREATMENT OF INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS WITH ADIPOSE-DERIVED REGENERATIVE CELLS MELLER, MICHAEL V —
18253520 ALGORITHMS FOR PREDICTING VUG CONNECTIVITY KIM, EUNHEE —
18185164 CXCL14 AS PREDICTIVE BIOMARKER FOR ACUTE LIVER FAILURE AND DEATH HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH —
16235442 APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ISOTOPE EXCHANGE AND/OR DIALYSIS NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18865299 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ULTRASOUND THERAPY IP, JASON M —
18779564 TREATMENT OF INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS WITH ADIPOSE-DERIVED REGENERATIVE CELLS MELLER, MICHAEL V —
18770447 TREATMENT OF INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS WITH PHENYLBUTYRATE AND MONITORING OF TREATMENT BARSKY, JARED —
18253520 ALGORITHMS FOR PREDICTING VUG CONNECTIVITY KIM, EUNHEE —
16235442 APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ISOTOPE EXCHANGE AND/OR DIALYSIS NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI —
18683240 CROSS-LINKED POLYMERIC CHELATORS COMPOSITIONS AND USE THEREOF ARMSTRONG, SUSANNAH SIPPLE —
17560870 FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL WITH REMOTE RESPONSIVE CONTROL FOR DYNAMIC CELL CULTURE LOPEZLIRA, ASHLEY NICOLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1
1655 1
1628 1
1738 1
1691 1
2188 1
1677 1
1779 1
1616 1
1799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18865299 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ULTRASOUND THERAPY IP, JASON M 3792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18779564 TREATMENT OF INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS WITH ADIPOSE-DERIVED REGENERATIVE CELLS MELLER, MICHAEL V 1655 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18770447 TREATMENT OF INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS WITH PHENYLBUTYRATE AND MONITORING OF TREATMENT BARSKY, JARED 1628 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2024
18537021 FORWARD OSMOSIS PROCESS TO INCREASE THE CONCENTRATION OF A DILUTE METAL SALT SOLUTION AND RELATED PROCESSES CRUM, VIVIAN FLORENCE 1738 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2023
18278329 HYDROXYLATION OF ALKANES USING OZONE CARR, DEBORAH D 1691 §103§112 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2023
18253520 ALGORITHMS FOR PREDICTING VUG CONNECTIVITY KIM, EUNHEE 2188 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 18, 2023
18185164 CXCL14 AS PREDICTIVE BIOMARKER FOR ACUTE LIVER FAILURE AND DEATH HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 1677 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 16, 2023
16235442 APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ISOTOPE EXCHANGE AND/OR DIALYSIS NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 1779 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 28, 2018
18683240 CROSS-LINKED POLYMERIC CHELATORS COMPOSITIONS AND USE THEREOF ARMSTRONG, SUSANNAH SIPPLE 1616 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2024
17560870 FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL WITH REMOTE RESPONSIVE CONTROL FOR DYNAMIC CELL CULTURE LOPEZLIRA, ASHLEY NICOLE 1799 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 23, 2021

Managing University of Kansas's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does University of Kansas have?

University of Kansas has 10 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 10 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most University of Kansas applications?

Jason M Ip has the most, with 1 of University of Kansas's pending office actions.

What technology area are University of Kansas's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month