Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| §112 only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 1 | 85.4% | +14.0% |
| MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS | 1 | 52.3% | +39.4% |
| MEADE, LORNE EDWARD | 1 | 50.4% | +39.7% |
| BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 1 | 63.7% | +39.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18281604 | COMPONENT-BASED METHOD FOR WORST-CASE ANALYSIS FOR STREAM-BASED SCHEDULING, CLASS-BASED SCHEDULING AND FRAME PREEMPTION IN TIME-SENSITIVE NETWORKS | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18035193 | PROPULSION UNIT FOR SPACECRAFT | MEADE, LORNE EDWARD | 134d overdue |
| 17762463 | BINDING MODULES COMPRISING MODIFIED EHD2 DOMAINS | BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 88d overdue |
| 17733898 | DETERMINING AN ACTUAL VALUE AND/OR AN ACTUAL VALUE RANGE OF AT LEAST ONE STATE VARIABLE OF A FLUID IN A FLUID FLOW BY MEANS OF AT LEAST ONE INDICATOR PARTICLE | MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS | 4d overdue |
| 18281604 | COMPONENT-BASED METHOD FOR WORST-CASE ANALYSIS FOR STREAM-BASED SCHEDULING, CLASS-BASED SCHEDULING AND FRAME PREEMPTION IN TIME-SENSITIVE NETWORKS | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2441 | 1 |
| 2855 | 1 |
| 3741 | 1 |
| 1643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18281604 | COMPONENT-BASED METHOD FOR WORST-CASE ANALYSIS FOR STREAM-BASED SCHEDULING, CLASS-BASED SCHEDULING AND FRAME PREEMPTION IN TIME-SENSITIVE NETWORKS | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 2441 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
| 17733898 | DETERMINING AN ACTUAL VALUE AND/OR AN ACTUAL VALUE RANGE OF AT LEAST ONE STATE VARIABLE OF A FLUID IN A FLUID FLOW BY MEANS OF AT LEAST ONE INDICATOR PARTICLE | MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS | 2855 | §103 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | May 05, 2023 |
| 18035193 | PROPULSION UNIT FOR SPACECRAFT | MEADE, LORNE EDWARD | 3741 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 134d overdue | Pending | May 03, 2023 |
| 17762463 | BINDING MODULES COMPRISING MODIFIED EHD2 DOMAINS | BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 1643 | §112 | Final Rejection | 88d overdue | Pending | Mar 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial