Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
URSrobot AI Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There are currently 2 pending office actions associated with this portfolio. These matters are split across 2 distinct art units. This distribution suggests that even with a small number of active cases, the company is engaging with different technical silos within the patent office. The presence of 2 pending office actions indicates a focused prosecution effort.
The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each matter is being handled by a different individual. This lack of overlap between examiners and art units means the company must manage two separate prosecution tracks simultaneously. Practitioners should be prepared for distinct procedural requirements in each of the 2 distinct art units assigned to the portfolio.
PARK, CHANMIN is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents half of the 2 pending office actions currently facing URSrobot AI Inc. The outcome of the work with PARK, CHANMIN will determine the success of fifty percent of the company's current pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARK, CHANMIN | 1 | 45.2% | +22.7% |
| HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR | 1 | 69.6% | +36.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19014101 | BOUNDARY DEFINING METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | PARK, CHANMIN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18503660 | BOUNDARY POSITIONING DEVICE | HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR | 17d overdue |
| 19014101 | BOUNDARY DEFINING METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | PARK, CHANMIN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3661 | 1 |
| 3669 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19014101 | BOUNDARY DEFINING METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | PARK, CHANMIN | 3661 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 08, 2025 |
| 18503660 | BOUNDARY POSITIONING DEVICE | HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR | 3669 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial