Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DODDS, SCOTT | 1 | 68.5% | +35.2% |
| AHMED, SHEEBA | 1 | 80.6% | +14.2% |
| ZHANG, MICHAEL N | 1 | 53.8% | +24.7% |
| WORRELL, KEVIN | 1 | 11.7% | -6.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18670595 | Single-Layer, High-Caliper Basemats and Fibrous Panels Including Same | AHMED, SHEEBA | 62d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17810583 | Suspended Ceiling Tile System Including Panel With Silicate Coating For Improved Acoustical Performance | WORRELL, KEVIN | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18670621 | Process for Manufacturing Acoustical Panel | DODDS, SCOTT | 89d overdue |
| 18444832 | SOILING SOLUTION | ZHANG, MICHAEL N | 8d overdue |
| 18670595 | Single-Layer, High-Caliper Basemats and Fibrous Panels Including Same | AHMED, SHEEBA | 62d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| 1787 | 1 |
| 1781 | 1 |
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18670621 | Process for Manufacturing Acoustical Panel | DODDS, SCOTT | 1746 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 89d overdue | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
| 18670595 | Single-Layer, High-Caliper Basemats and Fibrous Panels Including Same | AHMED, SHEEBA | 1787 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 62d | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
| 18444832 | SOILING SOLUTION | ZHANG, MICHAEL N | 1781 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Feb 19, 2024 |
| 17810583 | Suspended Ceiling Tile System Including Panel With Silicate Coating For Improved Acoustical Performance | WORRELL, KEVIN | 1789 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Jul 01, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial