Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Uvat Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Uvat Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a concentrated effort on a specific chemical or material innovation, with all prosecution efforts directed through a single administrative channel.

The busiest examiner, CROWELL, ANNA M, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This figure represents the total active workload for the company's portfolio. Since there is only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution is limited to one specialized sector of the patent office. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of CROWELL, ANNA M to achieve a favorable outcome for this Chemistry & Materials application.

With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company faces a highly concentrated prosecution environment. The busiest examiner, CROWELL, ANNA M, handles the 1 pending office action, meaning her individual review will determine the outcome of the application. Practitioners must ensure that the prosecution strategy is precisely aligned with the standards of this art unit and the specific preferences of the assigned examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CROWELL, ANNA M 1 44.6% +30.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18380216 TWO-ELECTRODE CONTINUOUS PLASMA PROCESSING SYSTEM CROWELL, ANNA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1716 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18380216 TWO-ELECTRODE CONTINUOUS PLASMA PROCESSING SYSTEM CROWELL, ANNA M 1716 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2023

Managing Uvat Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month