Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Van Der Hoeven Horticultural Projects B V is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Both of these active matters are assigned to 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a high degree of concentration in the company's patent prosecution, as all current inquiries are being handled by the same official within a single technical division. This structure allows for a very consistent prosecution strategy across the entire active portfolio.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is LYNCH, CARLY W, who is responsible for 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. Because this 1 distinct examiner is handling all 2 pending office actions, the company's success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector is entirely dependent on the feedback and standards of this individual. Practitioners should note that the consistency provided by 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner simplifies the management of technical arguments. However, it also means that the examiner's specific interpretation of the technology will have a significant impact on all active matters in the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYNCH, CARLY W | 2 | 51.8% | +48.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17537682 | Greenhouse | LYNCH, CARLY W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18100631 | PROCESS TO GROW PLANTS IN A GREENHOUSE | LYNCH, CARLY W | 114d overdue |
| 17537682 | Greenhouse | LYNCH, CARLY W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18100631 | PROCESS TO GROW PLANTS IN A GREENHOUSE | LYNCH, CARLY W | 3643 | §103 | Final Rejection | 114d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 17537682 | Greenhouse | LYNCH, CARLY W | 3643 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 30, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial