Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Veho Tech Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. Both matters are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patent prosecution is concentrated in a particular technical area but involves multiple reviewers.
STEPHANIE SHOSHANA WALLICK is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. This is equal to the workload of the other 2 distinct examiners. The presence of pending actions within a distinct art unit indicates a focused technical area for the company's current prosecution. Having distinct examiners for each pending office action means that each case is being evaluated independently within the art unit. This structure allows the company to receive feedback from different examiners on its pending actions while remaining within the 1 distinct art unit. The 2 pending office actions represent the company's current activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | 1 | 29.3% | +37.6% |
| KIM, PATRICK | 1 | 26.3% | +33.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19066945 | TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA | KIM, PATRICK | 56d |
| 19225832 | ROUTING PACKETS THROUGH DYNAMIC ROUTING HUBS | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19066945 | TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA | KIM, PATRICK | 56d |
| 19225832 | ROUTING PACKETS THROUGH DYNAMIC ROUTING HUBS | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19225832 | ROUTING PACKETS THROUGH DYNAMIC ROUTING HUBS | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | — | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 02, 2025 |
| 19066945 | TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA | KIM, PATRICK | 3628 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Feb 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial