Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBALE, GAUTAM | 1 | 53.9% | +47.7% |
| TUTOR, AARON N | 1 | 33.5% | +34.9% |
| CHAO, MICHAEL W | 1 | 70.0% | +40.6% |
| JUNG, HENRY H | 1 | 24.0% | +31.1% |
| CASTILHO, EDUARDO D | 1 | 47.4% | +20.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18688581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPEN BANKING BASED-SUBSCRIPTION VIA A UNIVERSAL GATEWAY | JUNG, HENRY H | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18840584 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ONLINE PAYMENT ON A PAYMENT TERMINAL | UBALE, GAUTAM | 46d overdue |
| 18688581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPEN BANKING BASED-SUBSCRIPTION VIA A UNIVERSAL GATEWAY | JUNG, HENRY H | 9d overdue |
| 18557778 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY PAYMENTS | CASTILHO, EDUARDO D | 20d |
| 18730213 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIGHT-BASED TAMPER DETECTION IN POINT-OF-SALE DEVICES | TUTOR, AARON N | 33d |
| 18705108 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING A POTENTIAL TAMPER CONDITION OF A SECURE DEVICE | CHAO, MICHAEL W | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3689 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| 3695 | 1 |
| 3698 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18840584 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ONLINE PAYMENT ON A PAYMENT TERMINAL | UBALE, GAUTAM | 3689 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 46d overdue | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
| 18730213 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIGHT-BASED TAMPER DETECTION IN POINT-OF-SALE DEVICES | TUTOR, AARON N | 3627 | §103 | Final Rejection | 33d | Pending | Jul 18, 2024 |
| 18705108 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING A POTENTIAL TAMPER CONDITION OF A SECURE DEVICE | CHAO, MICHAEL W | 2492 | §103 | Final Rejection | 33d | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 18688581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPEN BANKING BASED-SUBSCRIPTION VIA A UNIVERSAL GATEWAY | JUNG, HENRY H | 3695 | §101 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Mar 01, 2024 |
| 18557778 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY PAYMENTS | CASTILHO, EDUARDO D | 3698 | §103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial