Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Veritone Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. Despite having different examiners, both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the company's current filings in the software sector.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is HUSSAIN, TAUQIR, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is split. This structure allows the company to see how different examiners within the same 1 distinct art unit interpret their software innovations. Practitioners should be prepared for separate prosecution tracks even though the technical area is unified within 1 distinct art unit, as each examiner may prioritize different aspects of the pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUSSAIN, TAUQIR | 1 | 84.3% | +25.8% |
| WERNER, MARSHALL L | 1 | 66.1% | +40.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19202412 | COGNITIVE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | HUSSAIN, TAUQIR | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16177282 | NEURAL NETWORK ORCHESTRATION | WERNER, MARSHALL L | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16177282 | NEURAL NETWORK ORCHESTRATION | WERNER, MARSHALL L | 28d |
| 19202412 | COGNITIVE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | HUSSAIN, TAUQIR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2125 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19202412 | COGNITIVE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | HUSSAIN, TAUQIR | — | §102§103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2025 |
| 16177282 | NEURAL NETWORK ORCHESTRATION | WERNER, MARSHALL L | 2125 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Oct 31, 2018 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial