Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

View Systems Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

View Systems Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These 3 actions are being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners, which ensures that no single examiner has an outsized influence on the portfolio's overall progress. The matters are distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technical overlap in the software categories being pursued by the company.

LEWIS, CHERYL RENEA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. Since all 3 distinct examiners hold exactly one action, the prosecution risk is well-distributed among different individuals at the USPTO. The 2 distinct art units for 3 pending actions indicate a relatively focused technical scope, yet the company must still address the specific requirements of 3 different individuals.

Practitioners should be aware that with 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, each case requires an independent approach. The 2 distinct art units involved mean that while some cases may share a similar technical background, they are still being evaluated under different examination groups. This distribution requires a versatile prosecution strategy to handle the 3 different examiner perspectives.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEWIS, CHERYL RENEA 1 92.8% +7.9%
YEN, SYLING 1 75.0% +28.1%
NGUYEN, LOAN T 1 64.2% +23.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19350480 LEVERAGING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) FOR SEMANTICALLY CHUNKING CONTENT LEWIS, CHERYL RENEA —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19347363 SEARCHING VECTOR EMBEDDINGS BASED ON CONTEXT RADIUS YEN, SYLING —
19214004 DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURABLE DATA PROCESSING PIPELINE NGUYEN, LOAN T —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19347363 SEARCHING VECTOR EMBEDDINGS BASED ON CONTEXT RADIUS YEN, SYLING —
19214004 DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURABLE DATA PROCESSING PIPELINE NGUYEN, LOAN T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2166 2
2165 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19350480 LEVERAGING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) FOR SEMANTICALLY CHUNKING CONTENT LEWIS, CHERYL RENEA 2166 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2025
19347363 SEARCHING VECTOR EMBEDDINGS BASED ON CONTEXT RADIUS YEN, SYLING 2166 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2025
19214004 DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURABLE DATA PROCESSING PIPELINE NGUYEN, LOAN T 2165 §101§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2025

Managing View Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does View Systems Inc. have?

View Systems Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most View Systems Inc. applications?

Cheryl Renea Lewis has the most, with 1 of View Systems Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are View Systems Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month