Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
VIFFFF HOLDING AG has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patent prosecution is focused on a specific chemical or material science innovation, with no current activity in other technical areas.
Having 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action allows the applicant to focus on a single set of examiner expectations. This avoids the complexity of managing multiple pending cases across different art units. Practitioners can develop a highly targeted strategy based on the specific feedback from the 1 distinct examiner involved.
CHAWLA, JYOTI is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 busiest examiner pending, this individual is the sole examiner responsible for the company's current pending matters. The resolution of this 1 pending office action will determine the company's immediate progress in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1 | 52.7% | +30.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18027010 | DISH FROM FERMENTED MIXTURES AND ITS PREPARATION | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18027010 | DISH FROM FERMENTED MIXTURES AND ITS PREPARATION | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18027010 | DISH FROM FERMENTED MIXTURES AND ITS PREPARATION | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1791 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial