Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Väderstad Holding AB

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Väderstad Holding AB is managing 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different official. While there are 3 distinct examiners involved, the portfolio is concentrated within 2 distinct art units, indicating some overlap in the technical categories being pursued by the company.

The busiest examiner for the company is MITCHELL, JOEL F, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Given that there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly split among the officials. The fact that 3 distinct examiners are operating within 2 distinct art units suggests that the company is navigating multiple reviews within a limited set of technical groups. This structure requires the company to manage 3 separate examiner interactions while addressing the technical requirements of the 2 distinct art units involved in the current prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MITCHELL, JOEL F 1 61.1% +17.0%
HARP, WILLIAM RAY 1 79.1% +10.8%
NGUYEN, JASON TOAN 1 55.2% +42.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18034130 Agricultural Implement for Soil Working and Method of Determining Working Depth of Soil Working Agricultural Implement NGUYEN, JASON TOAN 26d overdue
18851824 Agricultural Implements and Methods of Folding Agricultural Implements MITCHELL, JOEL F —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18034130 Agricultural Implement for Soil Working and Method of Determining Working Depth of Soil Working Agricultural Implement NGUYEN, JASON TOAN 26d overdue
18548643 AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT, A COMPUTER PROGRAM, A COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AIRFLOW IN A FEED SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT OF THE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT HARP, WILLIAM RAY 30d
18851824 Agricultural Implements and Methods of Folding Agricultural Implements MITCHELL, JOEL F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3653 1
3666 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18851824 Agricultural Implements and Methods of Folding Agricultural Implements MITCHELL, JOEL F — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18548643 AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT, A COMPUTER PROGRAM, A COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AIRFLOW IN A FEED SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT OF THE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT HARP, WILLIAM RAY 3653 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Sep 01, 2023
18034130 Agricultural Implement for Soil Working and Method of Determining Working Depth of Soil Working Agricultural Implement NGUYEN, JASON TOAN 3666 §103§112 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Apr 27, 2023

Managing Väderstad Holding AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month